The disruptor kills the enemy before the other weapons chew through defences, in which case the other weapons were worthless The other weapons do chew through the defences in time. They fit on completely different types of ships. 9. Mining lasers are now classified as Brawling weapons. Your disruptor is also shorter range. - After researching cloaking, most science ships belonging to AI near Fallen Empires with closed borders become permanently trapped in emergency FTL as they keep trying and failing to path. Stellaris Wiki Active Wikis. 6? I'd go with this 1. Penetrated by guided weapons, strike craft, and some exotic energy weapons (Disruptors, Arc Emitters, and Cloud Lightning). Component. This page was last edited on 14 October 2017, at 11:49. A quick search reveals that shield hardening apparently stacks. • 10 mo. Malaficus Shaikan May 6, 2022 @ 11:15pm. 2. 0 unless otherwise noted. Refire rate and general stats have been adjusted. Welcome to the Stellaris Tech Id Full List, where we will provide you the full list of ids you can use in console commands, cheats and mods. Compatible with Stellaris v3. Mai 2016 um 6:42. ; About Stellaris Wiki; Mobile viewThis page was last edited on 14 October 2017, at 11:47. Disruptors and the new L-size autocannon are a joke with 40 range on a battleship (shortest range ship computer only advances to 50 range). Stellaris UI Suggestion: Stellaris UI Improvement (Planet UI and Build Queues) EU4 Suggestion: Improving Development: Development: Dynamic and Mana-based. Disruptors have 30 range while Missiles have 100 range. 1. ; About Stellaris Wiki; Mobile viewDisruptors fire high-energy bolts that weaken and destroy the molecular bonds that hold the target's constituent atoms together. Energy Weapons (Lasers, Neutron Launchers etc. KA + Plasma basically. This is a problem that most modifiers have in Stellaris; instead of each one multiplying the output of the previous one, they all get added together and then applied to the base value. Improved Structural Integrity is actually a tech I never research. I know stellaris ship design is a lot of countering enemy ships, but in general, is having a fleet that mainly targets hull a…Stellaris. ) are good against armor but bad against shields. 1 - They are just weapons in your ships and starbases. level 1. . Disruptors and Defense platforms are both terrible for the same reason: disengagement. Depending on your exact economic build, it'll be worth somewhere between +20% to +40% job output bonus. Null void beams vs disruptors vs strike craft and missiles. Strike craft are good against small ships (corvettes and to a lesser degree destroyers) and they are the best form of point defense in the game. Then they all do damage to the hull, and disruptor damage is very low compared to the rest. Propulsion Proponent Proclamation. Now countered by armour, or by shield hardening, so best used paired with. Not having to fight down those makes disruptors worth using. And seeing as how this game is in the 2330s, and you finished Ion Disruptors after Jump Drives, it seems quite likely you picked up Ion Disruptor debris, finished the research, and skipped Disruptors entirely. This mode. This page was last edited on 14 October 2017, at 11:48. 例如：“异种保护区”（建筑）的特殊说明请在. Disruptors fire high-energy bolts that weaken and destroy the molecular bonds that hold the target's constituent atoms together. I am ~400h in Stellaris and still really luck of understanding all weapon types use-cases. kinetic are outgunned my kinetic artillery. The next two are the only real 'Choice' involved here. Videogames, Guides, Cheats and Codes. Kusto_ • 5 mo. On battleships, late in the game. If thats Contingency, just use disruptors instead. If that's the case, you want a screen of corvettes/destroyers rocking PD and Ion Disruptors. With how high armour/shield values are vs HP, disruptors and Arc Emitters just delete anything, including all regular enemies, fallen empires and all crisis. plasma weapons are great against high armor targets with low-ish evasion (ie. As a devouring swarm, I only ever build up to a maximum of 12 soldiers and set them to aggressive and they automatically land on the planet when the system is taken if they have a good chance at winning. What’s up everyone. In beta disruptors are like missiles, and torpedos. 2 - Starfighters. how disruptors became god tier in stellaris disruptors are now god tier in stellaris, but why? this video will answer your stellaris ascension perks and ascension paths have been updated with stellaris 3. Gun battery - kinetic weapon, bonus. This is why in practice, disruptor corvettes do so well against normal corvettes as corvettes have both low health and lowered damage due to the hull damage. I doubt though the the original intent of the developer was to potentially end 40% of the games before the end game crisis or a FE awakening. gizmopower Jul 10, 2017 @ 3:47am. 0 unless otherwise noted. Not enough. ' （' ）是《 群星 》中一项可供研究的科技，本页面是一个分支页面，关于科技详情，请参考主干页面： 科技 。. I think I understand that you can build districts on other peoples planets so you’d probably be more diplomatic but I can see how impactful that really can be. You might win some battles but your losses will probably be worse than theirs. 3. In most cases yes. I usually use Arc Emitters + CLC + Disruptors (ie all energy), but if you have bonuses or better tech in kinetic or missiles that's fine, just pick the weapons that will bypass as much of their shields and armor as possible. A pure Disruptor Cruiser will have 5 M Disruptors at 2 S Disruptors, which only gives 45 DPS. You may have to deal with rampaging marauders, border skirmishes, genocidal empires, economy problems, and many other things. 3. But I completed the game several times on that rig, because the. You can build cloaked ships and the cloaking tech level competes with the sensore tech level, with an additional bonus of an accension perk being used for. How good is a disruptor/ cloud lightning/ emitter monofleet? I know a fleet of corvette's with autocannons followed up by a fleet of BB's with energy…My favourite builds for the smaller ships are either full disruptors with picket combat computers or full missiles with artillery combat computers. Definitely strong, but given how expensive planetary ascension is that doesn't look out of line at all. Disruptors, Autocannons, and Torpedoes are all very strong short-ranged weapons. Giga Cannons have longer range (150) than the launchers (130) and strip the shields first; then the Neutron Launchers blow the enemy up. Due to this, they're extremely good against stations in the early and. Fist one is supper effective against shields but utterly useless against hull, second one ignores shields but have ridiculous min damage of 1. You get 15% pop output and quick&efficient pop modding, while getting all the bonuses of being cyborg. However these are mostly techno-babble terms than anything realistic and realism has never been a thing Stellaris has (or should) concerned itself with, so just make them look like energy beams that give off light. All of this means that mid and late game the top level laser weapons hit first, hit more types of ships, hit more often, and do more per hit than plasma weapons. No idea if this is supposed to be like this, or how the game was in the past, I haven't been playing Stellaris enough to know. 2 Cloud Lightning 2. And to a lesser extent the cloud lightning weapon. While Stellaris’ 4X-flavored. · 5 yr. 5K fleet if you're specializing. 1 Table usage 2 Computing 3 Field Manipulation 4 Particles 5 References Table usage Color indicators: Starter, Acquisition, Rare, Dangerous, Repeatable . But yea, I don't consider disruptors a weapon, their stats make much better point defense even in a medium slot. Advanced shields require Strategic Resource to make. They're more useful against enemy ships that have high defenses and cannot disengage (Gray Tempest, Contingency), but even then you'll probably want to use. Science fiction novels that might be interesting to Stellaris players. Do not bring destroyers or corvettes into the battle as the scourge will decimate them. I'd be curious about this, too. Apprehensive-Wolf-32 • 4 mo. In Stellaris, there isn't a predefined tech tree that you have to follow through the game like in the Civilization series for example. This means that, on things where you can stack a bunch of bonuses, the marginal positive or negative modifier doesn't do as much as it implies. But once the AI starts making primarily cruisers and battleships, or the crisis comes around, I always update my battleships to spinal/large ships because disruptor range is trash and arc lightning DPS is also trash. Mining lasers are now classified as Brawling weapons. With regards to disruptors: They're very good in the early game, since everything has little relative HP and fights are mostly at point blank anyways. Ion Disruptors 8000: 3 Ion Disruptor Disruptors Base: 65Regular disruptors are all or nothing kinda deal. Autocannon corvettes will wreck the missile corvettes or even just disruptor corvettes. Could have been a legendary leader? Theres one guy who gives +50% evasion. Another variant is to add disruptors instead of laser or gauss cannons so shields will be completely bypassed. So I recommend just experimenting, getting intel on your opponents, and observing what they had when they beat you, or when you won, and try and deduce from that what is effective for yourself - disruptor corvettes and torpedo frigates with bait carriers is something I'm thinking about at the moment, but a week or so before it was all in one. . Or Energy Torpedos. Disruptors, Autocannons, and Torpedoes are all very strong short-ranged weapons. most contingency fleets burn through armor, seeker drones penetrate shields - so focus on shields, counter their strike craft with your own+point defense. 5+ AND V2. Vote. 3. 裂解炮发射出的高能射束，能够同时弱化并破坏构成目标原子间的分子键。. On the long-range side there's also Neutron Launchers, Kinetic Artillery, Strike Craft, and Tachyon Lance. Blocked pops with the Psionic trait to also receive the Latent Psionic trait. 0 unless otherwise noted. Depending on your empire ethics will determine the interactions available for you. 如果满足. More counters should exist for different strategies, and mixed fleets should be more viable than before, covering for the weaknesses of other ship types. 6 combat rebalance against powerful torpedo and carrier f. ) You want plasma cannons [at highest level] or neutron launchers [I'd prefer this one] instead of disruptors, and you probably want Artillery sections for your battleship rather than that Broadside section in the core. Sillez_zockt. Members Online •. I want to return to playing stellaris after long break and I'm wondering what is current best fleet. The disruptors are not. Torpedo assault carrier is the most balanced ship design. This gives you an opportunity to counter their defenses and kill them faster than they can kill you. X . The main weapons are Strike Craft + Missiles (not Torpedoes) + Arc Emitters + Disruptors + Cloud Lightning. I. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the 4X grand strategy game Stellaris by Paradox Development Studio. The range is too short and Battleships are all about long range. The meta is dominated by Torpedoes, Carriers, and Artillery. 1. Meanwhile, try to expand outwards and look for suitable new colonies. 2 Anti-Hull 2. 31. Bcs they are op. Long term, sure, there aren't repeatable techs for hull, so as time goes on disruptor type weapons can't be further defended against (this is why they are good against the fallen empires, since they are deep into repeatable techs and don't use crystal plating). modifier. Cruisers can use Disruptors, but you don't want to go pure Disruptor since the damage output is mediocre. . As nonsensical as it would have seemed in 1. . TTundri • 6 mo. corisai Mar 22, 2019 @ 4:38pm. AI is so bad you could have PD spam as your dps as long as you have the numbers. 10 Pyxis update - you can find a bit more info on the Steam page. I knew of two weapons Perdition Beam because it wasnt classed as any type of weapon achetype and fighters because only the first launched fighter in the squadrion was getting the repeatable buff. Unlike most weapons, they get less efficient when used in larger slots. ago. Really don't trust Focused Arc Emitters dmg and range when enemies get close. List of all technology ids to be used with "research_technology" debug console command. There are hostile crystalline entities of red, yellow, blue, and green throughout the Galaxy, and defend their home crystal with 4 fleets. It dies basically every single time I put it into a fight against a decent fleet. Kumqwatwhat • 5 yr. Depends on who you're fighting. If you don't have. For direct-fire guns to go alongside missiles, I favor disruptors, yeah. + Ignores 100% Armor. Missiles start with 0 Evasion and end with 40. Using dark matter tech on your disruptor corvettes is horribly, horribly uneconomical. Using dark matter tech on your disruptor corvettes is horribly, horribly uneconomical. Or If getting 4 Admirals on the council is hard or impossible , Synth Admirals leading a. A quick search reveals that shield hardening apparently stacks. Alternately, if you have access to advanced Disruptors, these weapons are excellent against the Contingency since they. ; About Stellaris Wiki; Mobile viewLater game, disruptor corvettes are better than missiles. By using disruptors and going all-in on shield-and-armor bypass, their top-tier defenses are basically irrelevant. )Mr. Disruptors can be equipped on the artillery slot of battleships right? You use them after high repeatables for 10x or 25x crisis since it ignores their armor and shields. Plasma is good, but it should also be paired with kinetic weapons. The disruptor fleet does well at the beginning, but. Just slap those bois everywhere till you get battleships, then rush for arc emitters and kill void clouds to get cloud lightning. Full Disruptor fleets can be a thing, but the issue is raw DPS. Thread starter EvilMachine; Start date Jan 26, 2019; Jump to latest Follow Reply Menu. With limited number of disengage chances , you can safely deal pop shots to the hull and not worry about them retreating before the big guns can cycle. Missiles are also horrifically countered by PDS~~/Strike Craft~~, so anything heavy on missiles is a self-solving problem. Didn't even have boosters on. Medium disruptor has range 60 and average damage 6. Also, the Plasma and Autocannon weapons (and Disruptors. Medium disruptor has range 60 and average damage 6. 6. The rest of the Stellaris combat ships, and their advantages and disadvantages, are at the Battleship, Destroyer, Titan, Cruiser and Colossus pages. shadowtheimpure. But lasers (which includes plasma / disruptors / lances / energy torpedoes) have the best armor pen / accuracy / tracking compared to kinetic. Autocannons need a -disengage chance to targets. All Discussions Screenshots Artwork Broadcasts Videos Workshop News Guides Reviews. Two autocannos and a plasma makes them quite good. Disruptors: tech_disruptors_1: Doctrine: Armada Battle Formation: tech_doctrine_fleet_size_5: Doctrine: Fleet Liasions:. Research the fleet size techs, build Anchorages in starbases to raise your overall fleet cap, etc. (If you are all missles then create two ships that are point defense only. 1 Anti-Armor 2. A destroyer with lightning cloud and two s disruptors is a good, solid build. 1 Mining Laser 2. Wouldn't it be great if Stellaris would allow us to develop and deploy cloaking devices (Hello SciFi franchises). Against small targets like Corvettes, Small Disruptors actually out-damage Medium Disruptors anyways due to their higher tracking, and against big targets I'd much rather have the Torpedo. 3 Arc Emitter 2. Incredible finds out the truth about StellarisFinding out the truth about Ship Designs In Stellaris. At the very least , the days of trying to overkill ships is over. Corvettes are why missile spam is good right now. And to. However, there is one exception: defense platforms cannot disengage. Disruptors and Defense platforms are both terrible for the same reason: disengagement. Disruptors can become quite powerful for a late-game empire that has completed the +5% energy weapon tech repeatable 40 or more times. 1 Overview 2 Energy weapons 2. and Neutron Launchers. 9] This mod aims to increase the individuality of empires while maintaining the highest possible level of compatibility with other mods and without changing how weapons work. I. phase distruptors suck big time. Stellaris 2. What I'm seeing is a technology that unlocks S-, M-, and L-slot Plasma weapons versus a technology that unlocks only S- and M-slot Disruptor weapons versus a technology that unlocks only S-slot Autocannons. Consumes power. 4 Lance 2. Armors and shields can be upgraded, and that means they are stronger and stronger, but hull. Choose weapons that ignore or are more effective against the enemy’s ship design. Disruptors are completely rubbish, and plasma are excellents weapons midgame, as in competitiv lobbies protons and neutrons are banned until year 50. Oct 12, 2022. Energy weapons also have a "special" kinds of weapons (Disruptors and Arc Emitters) that ignore both shields and armor, all damage goes directly to the hull but the overall damage can be pretty low. Enemy ships usually build countermeasures for missiles, and those are useless against energy attack. Shuttle Crash. Authors description: Amazing Space Battles. As rule of thumb mono-fleets are better than the ones with mixed ships at killing enemies. Simplicity is good in this context. Disruptors are spectacular when paired with cloud lightning or arc emitters and in large numbers, however by itself it is terrible. Disruptors and arc lighting are best used against fleets which have low number of ships but are instead very powerful, meaning they have large amount of shields and armor. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the 4X grand strategy game Stellaris by…They don't damage shields or armor, they're very short range, and they don't deal enough damage to kill the hull of anything without backup. 64 DPS. This gives you an opportunity to counter their defenses and kill them faster than they can kill you. Shields can be stacked higher than armour. The three key techs are blue lasers, corvette build cost reduction and extra corvette hull. Unbidden fleets. Otherwise you are mixing the bad traits of both, rather than exploiting the good of either. Azunai Jul 29, 2017 @ 1:53am. 1, currently 3 weapon types, (Phaser, Disruptor, Plasma) 2. Its range could be better (it's more the L-slot version of a Disruptor than it is a dedicated L-size weapon, and doesn't have the 120 base range that those have) but its ability to score. advertisement. Disruptors now unlock only if Energy Siphon critter weapon reverse-engineered (this. They also work well as a complementary weapon on Torpedo Cruisers. GameStop Moderna Pfizer Johnson & Johnson AstraZeneca Walgreens Best Buy Novavax SpaceX Tesla. A mix of guns and point defense (for shooting down missiles when taking the smaller starbases) and missiles/disruptors. Toggle signature. Cruisers with a torpedo front, a hangar mid, and the gunship stern. Enjoy the game! Immerse yourself in the exploration of a changing universe full of wonders! Check out this mod and modify your Stellaris experience. Stellaris. Use X - 4M 1 hangar - 2M battleship loadout with arc emitters and all medium disruptors. 3. They also have the theoretical longest range, since they can fly across an entire system, but they do suffer from travel time. - Autodesign mixes disruptors in with non-penetrating weapons, possibly because they're tagged as anti-hull despite not having a hull bonus. Not the most convenient thing to do but probably the. 8. 3 Penetrating 2. I love these ships. 27. Alle Diskussionen Screenshots Artworks Übertragungen Videos Workshop Neuigkeiten Guides Rezensionen. Arc Emitter Battleships with their 2 small Phase Disruptors, 2 PD and 2 medium Phase Disruptors (or 1 CL if you've unlocked that) While the Arc Emitter is an excellent and underrated weapon that deserves to be held as a highly competitive alternative to the Tachyon Lance and Giga Cannon, the Disruptors and Cloud Lightning are. This build is super powerful for tech rushing, expansion and war. • 1 yr. Go to Stellaris r/Stellaris. Disruptors are good in two contexts: late-endgame when everyone is in the repeatable tech chain, or early/mid-game when you're trying to snipe Fallen Empire end-game techs. For your bit about plasma throwers and point defence, yeah P slot weapons are way overtuned. Go to Stellaris r/Stellaris. 离子裂解炮 (Ion Disruptors) 解锁：在鼠标浮层中查看. Energy Point Defense can also be very useful. To expand on this, disrupters have lower DPS than kinetics or energy weapons, to compensate for the fact that they bypass shields and armor. They completely ignore shields and armor and deal base damage directly to the hull. You equip the same as with any others. Missiles in general are the best weapons till battleships, so upgrading those should become part of your tech choices. ) You want plasma cannons [at highest level] or neutron launchers [I'd prefer this one] instead of disruptors, and you probably want Artillery sections for your battleship rather than that Broadside section in the core. It’s not the be-all-end-all weapon, just a very useful one for early portions. Regular disruptors are all or nothing kinda deal. 对该项目的细节说明请添加至相关页面. As a brand-new player, unless I'm wrong, I hear you should just spam disruptors? On your ships from what I hear from vet players, disruptors are just the defacto best weapon to use? If I build a navy should I just spam the ever living hell out of them? Makes sense to just use the best in such a hard game. 3. Armor if you don't know what you're up against or don't really care (generally stronger then shields), shields if you know it'll counter the enemy (Unbidden/Contingency). If you're going to fight the enemy in the system with the disruption field generator (-20% shield hp, for reference), obviously it's beneficial. Disruptors aren't very good because, even though they go straight to hull, their low damage output will give enemy ships plenty of time to fight back as well as many chances to disengage. Space warfare. Better to instead build battleships with void lightning if you have it, or kinetic artillery/neutron launchers otherwise. It's just not worth polluting your tech tree with the repeatable techs it unlocks and more Defense Platform hull. Disruptor [edit | edit source] Disruptors fire energy bolts that damage and destroy the molecular bonds holding the target's constituent atoms together. These extradimensional invaders come to the galaxy in an attempt to make the universe similar to theirs - regardless of what that means for its inhabitants. It has few rewards but grants a unique ship at the end of the event chain. Missiles in general are the best weapons till battleships, so upgrading those should become part of your tech choices. Nathan Kraats. The Contingency is one of the three Endgame Crises that may arise to threaten the entire galaxy in Stellaris. If the enemy is using mostly disruptor/bypass weapons, then the counter is replacing your shields/armor with more crystal hull plating. The reason I ask this is that the tooltip suggests that disruptor bypass both shields and armour completely (100% penetration), this is further suggested because there are weapons with shield and armour damage, not penetration. You'll want to build larger ships (as they benefit more from armor) and fill them with armor. Disruptors have the same problem Autocannons (the intended anti-corvette weapons) have - too low damage per hit. 花1分钟创建用户后就能进行编辑 :) 登录 注册. 4. enemy leans much more torwards battle ships and. Hmm I guess I was thinking of energy siphons cause your right disruptors just ignore shields and armor, I just looked on the Stellaris wiki. Elcuern0 • 3 yr. Also destroyers are bad. Stellaris. All Discussions Screenshots Artwork Broadcasts Videos Workshop News Guides Reviews. With regards to missiles: Yes, they do get intercepted by point defense. my amount of ships goes like this 15 corvettes,7 destroyers and 5 cruisers for every battle ship, i have 5 BS. Refire rate and general stats have been adjusted. The disengagement clearly didn't worked in the beta patch for one example. Weapons that would normally bypass the shields/armor entirely are forced to deal 25% of their damage to the component they are trying to pierce, it's a counter to penetrating weapons. Smarter Ship Design [3. Distruptors yes, siphons no. ago. For just shield piercing, strike craft and missiles which are a lot more prevalent in AI fleets. Another good strategy is to use cloaking to engage at point blank range. The disruptor won on 1:1 ratio 2 hardener picket cruiser vs disruptor picket cruiser. Looking forward to test the fleet builds again, and check if the AI issues are fixed. Plasma Weapons: + More base damage than disruptors, but less than a laser. (For some reason, the Scourge Missile corvettes are the most powerful, fleet-strength wise. r/Stellaris. While inferior to battleships they can be deployed faster and are sturdy enough to survive a firefight. E. The disengagement clearly didn't worked in the beta patch for one example. Rule Zero of Stellaris combat: autodesigned ships suck so much they have an event horizon. Most warfare is settled through space combat. . Meewec Jan 5, 2020 @ 12:05am. The disruptors are not. 2. In both cases you want maximum afterburners to close the distance in the first case or kyte in the latter. They have the DPS of 20 disruptor corvettes and the HP of 15 but cost only 8 in fleet cap and 10 in alloys. Disruptors are awful because of short range, while the pitiful damage means high number of opportunities for emergency FTL, which reduces your number of actual kills especially if you are invading. ). It's not worth considering Disruptors. This is a problem that most modifiers have in Stellaris; instead of each one multiplying the output of the previous one, they all get added together and then applied to the base value. Flak seems to be the best point defense right now, and disruptors and plasma throwers are fine though shields are so weak some people even go as far as recommending plasma cannon only ships. Small. With the exception of Autocannons, Kinetic and Missile weapons no longer have bonus hull damage. ago. While Stellaris has never set worlds alight with its DLC, the Paradox sim remains one of. All Discussions Screenshots Artwork Broadcasts Videos Workshop News Guides Reviews. A disruptor fleet will chew through almost anything. 1. But if you're just defending with a bastion starbase, it doesn't seem very beneficial to use them; every starbase weapon module is already strong against shields. The primary counter is AA and your own fighters from cariers. 相位裂解炮 (Phase Disruptors) 解锁：在鼠标浮层中查看. Stellaris has too many macro-level setup implications that change what is or is not meta from galaxy generation. A properly kitted equals size fleet (Kinetic artilley to start combat, and something like plasma for closer ranges), will output 4-5x more damage with all the extra modifiers. The upside is that you don't waste research time on any weapon. a Tier 3 technology cannot be "drawn" until the country owns at least six Tier 2 technologies. Stellaris: Disruptor Devastation. ago. Disruptors are fair damage against anything with shields. CryptoStellaris 50512 Bug Reports 31005 Suggestions 19176 Tech Support 2909 Multiplayer 377 User Mods 4633 Stellaris AAR (After Action Reports) Console edition 1219. Disruptors and Autocannons are now considered Brawling weapons, with short range but faster attacks. Last time I played there was discussion between torpedo corvetes and lance battleships and everybody agreed that mixed. modifier. Otherwise disruptors and autocannons. In fact I'd say if it weren't for that stupid strikecraft slot, Disruptors would outperform cloud lightning. When tried out the disruptor builds like 99% of enemy ships disengaged, because of the low damage of the disruptors. 拥有 军国主义 思潮. So what's your opinion on the ascension rework in 3. This is a writeup on the best ship designs in Stellaris v 3. Use plasma cruisers or plasma battleships. It's also worth noting disruptors are on the tech path to arc-emitters, which I've found are solid late-game weapons due to their 100% accuracy and direct-hull damage. Flak on the other hand starts at 50 Tracking and ends at 70. . 2) Focused arc emitter/carrier/medium disruptor battleship (with afterburners) 3) Disruptor menacing corvettes (with afterburners, requires Become the Crisis). 1 Laser 2. 权重：75. That being said, their granddaddies the Focused Arc Emitter (X-size weapon) is an insanely good and strong weapon. Cooperative PvE can be initiated from the main menu - all players that hotjoin the hosted game will join the primary player’s empire. Has Anyone found this weapon to be any good? I'll admit I've never tried it due to it's low damage output even though all the damage goes straight to…In Stellaris, the Unbidden are beings from a dimension of pure energy. 8. ago. 6, though they took a lot of damage and there was a wider deviance; this was less clear cut than the others. And torpedos just ignore the shield and hit the ship for hull points/armor mitigation directly. so if a titan for example, has enough components such that it has 100% shield hardening, does this mean the shields are equally effective against a weapon that has 0% shield penetration as it is against a weapon with 100% shield penetration like cloud lightning or disruptors?The Stellaris 3. Play tested but certain events, special projects/anomalies could be effected. But baseline, a. They are capable of passing through shields and armor to wreak havoc directly on enemy hull and crew. 8000. Name: Tier: Type: Cost: Power: Min Damage: Max Damage: Cooldown: Average Damage: Range: Accuracy: Armor Penetration: Shield Damage Bonus: Shield PenetrationCorvettes with the 2S1PD section with disruptors&flak and destroyers with L Mount disruptor and flak shoud do okay. Mining lasers are now classified as Brawling weapons. Missiles and disruptors have been buffed in 3. It's pretty common in game development for a piece of content to be axed after art has already been created for it, so it just gets reused for something else. Disruptors are bad if you mix them with weapons that dont ignore shields or armor. In Stellaris ii's always better to customize fleet to your target than run with all-around designs. For example the ancient laster (Cavitation Collapser), resembles normal lasers. 6. But it also penetrates armor by 50%. Disruptors are only worth picking up once you're ready to go for Arc Emitter. Jump to latest Follow Reply. Any non-penetrating weapon on a disruptor fleet is probably worthless. Notes: The table shows the default names/icons of techs.